|
|||
|
|
|
|
Fine Prints: May, 2008 A Parable Revisited May 3 It's Campmeeting Time Again-Soon May 10 Why I Believe in Today's Youth May 17 A Truly Open Communion-I May 24 A Truly Open Communion-II May 31
Recently someone asked if I’d write a Fine Print about Christ’s parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31)—a story that can be rather confusing. Being an accommodating sort, I agreed. So here goes. Note the story’s stark contrasts. The rich man of the story is so wealthy that he dresses in clothing usually worn only by royalty. He has everything. Lazarus is so desperately poor, on the other hand, that he’s willing to share the table scraps thrown to the rich man’s dogs. The dogs, however, treat him as one of their own, even licking his sores. Then the beggar dies and goes to heaven ("Abraham’s side"), where, it seems, he experiences bliss. The rich man dies and ends up in hell, where he’s tormented. Not only does Jesus employ contrasts, He also uses hyperbole (exaggeration). In this highly stylized story, heaven and hell are so physically close that the respective occupants can see what’s going on in each other’s realm. Moreover, heaven and hell are within talking distance—suggesting that the specific details of this fanciful tale aren’t to be taken literally. Understandably, the tormented rich man doesn’t relish his lot. So he pleads for a little relief—even a drop of water to cool his parched tongue (as if a single drop could have any significant effect). No luck, though. Abraham reminds the rich man that, ironically, he had it made throughout his lifetime—but now is in agony. By contrast, Lazarus had a life of agony—but now has it made. Abraham further reminds the rich man that his destiny is fixed. He made his bed, so now he can lie in it. The gulf between heaven and hell can’t be traversed. You ultimately stay where your choices take you. The rich man, accepting the inescapability of the consequences of his choices, asks for Abraham to send Lazarus back from heaven to tell his five brothers about life’s—and death’s—ultimate realities so they can avoid the agony of hell that he’s experiencing. "They already have the teachings of Moses and the prophets, that should be good enough," Abraham says. "True," the rich man replies, "but it would be far more impressive if someone were to come back from the dead to warn them." "You know what?" Abraham replies, "if your brothers ignore Moses and the other prophets God has sent, they’re wouldn’t pay any attention even if someone were to rise from the dead." End of parable. And what does it mean? Probably a lot of things. I would suggest that Jesus isn’t affirming a literal hell. Rather, He’s telling us that we don’t need dramatic miracles in order to have faith. There’s plenty of evidence already. In fact, if we haven’t developed faith on the basis of what we see revealed of God already, chances are we’re not going to suddenly get on the bandwagon just because God does something really impressive. In the case of Jesus, He rose from the dead. That’s about as dramatic as miracles get. But did it didn’t win over many skeptics then. And, unfortunately, things haven’t changed all that much in the intervening years. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor
It's Campmeeting Time
Again-Soon
In keeping with our 19th-century roots, most regions of the North
American Seventh-day Adventist Church conduct an annual campmeeting.
Adventists gather for spiritual refreshment and social interaction. And
in many cases they actually stay in tents, just as they did in "the good
old days." While relatively small numbers reside in tents at the campmeeting
conducted each year on the campus of Forest Lake Academy here in Orlando
(in part, because it gets a wee bit hot under the canvas), large numbers
attend the event. Notable speakers are brought in for the occasion, and
it’s a high point of the year for many. Since Orlando is blessed with good preachers, good musical talent and
a large number of members, local Adventists here may not be as attracted
to campmeeting as are those from remote areas. But even in Orlando, many
look forward to the spiritual blessing and the chance to reconnect with
friends from throughout the state. For two reasons, we always conduct services here at Markham Woods
Church–even when campmeeting is on. First, not everyone enjoys the crowds, the steel-chair seating and
the general ambience of campmeeting. For those, a quiet service in the
church is preferable. Second, Markham Woods Church’s pastors are philosophically committed
to keeping the church open 52 weeks out of the year, come what may. Even
when we conduct our Church Retreat, which draws away large numbers of
our members, we still conduct services at 9:00 and 11:30 am. Why? Because we never know who may turn up for church. If we have
members who don’t want to go to campmeeting or to the retreat, we don’t
want them to have no service to attend. And if someone suddenly decides
to visit our church, we want them to find us here. As many as half of those attending our church during campmeeting and
the Church Retreat are visitors. How terrible it would be if they came
to get a blessing but didn’t find anyone here and didn’t feel like
driving to some other place of worship. Certainly, our church service on these occasions (this year
campmeeting is just one weekend, May 23-25) is streamlined because we
know attendance will be small and the participant pool also small. At
9:00 am we have First Service as usual–except that the crowd will be
diminished. At 10:10 am we offer only two collect-all children’s Sabbath
School classes, no youth classes from Grade 7 or above and only one
adult class (in the Sanctuary). At 11:30 am we conduct Second Service as
usual. Other than these slight variations, it’s business as usual when it
comes to worship at Markham Woods during the weekends of campmeeting and
the Chuch Retreat. Those who want to go to campmeeting are encouraged to do so. Those
who want to worship in their familiar surroundings are equally
encouraged to do so. We hope that wherever you worship, your soul will
be refreshed and your spirit uplifted.
Why I Believe in Today's Youth
A lot of people say negative things about youth these days. Listen
to this: "The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt
for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place
of exercise. Children are now tyrants, . . . They no longer rise when
elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before
company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and
tyrannize their teachers." Rumor has it that Socrates—who lived before Jesus—spoke those words.
So kids have been getting a bad rap for a long time. But wait a minute.
Some people say Socrates never said that at all. On the Internet’s
Literature Network Forums, I came across this post: "I've seen this
quote attributed to Plato, to Socrates, to Aristotle, to Cicero, to
Hesiod, to 'an old monk,' to an Assyrian cuneiform tablet, and to an
ancient Egyptian papyrus. Though people have been searching for the
source for fifty years, no satisfying answer has ever been produced.
It's just one of those things which people need to believe." And want to
believe, I might add. So it looks like someone who lived not all that long ago said
it—probably an old dude with major hostility toward kids. He then tried
to hang it on Socrates. (Didn’t he realize that lying is worse than the
misbehavior he was lamenting?) Anyway, I think pretty highly of today’s kids. Let me tell you a
story that partly explains why. On our most recent Pathfinder campout, the entire club went down the
Ichetucknee River on tubes or rafts. Along the way, a few kids decided
to get on someone else’s raft. Others decided to swim. In fact, seven
tubes or rafts were just abandoned as kids chose other forms of getting
to the destination. Such blatant irresponsibility definitely upset some
of us as leaders. So that night at worship I took the unknown miscreants to task. I
explained that we get the tubes from a rental company. The company
obviously doesn’t want to lose its equipment. Hadn’t they thought about
that before they just abandoned what they’d been entrusted with?
Further, the Pathfinder Club, as the renter, was responsible to get
every item back safely. Who did they think would end up paying if their
tubes and rafts went missing? In fact, I told my listeners in no uncertain terms that I would have
expected fourth-graders to understand such simple concepts. So the fact
that seventh-graders and above had done what they did, was disturbing.
"I’m not going to try to track down who did it," I assured them. "But
let me tell you, I’m really, really disappointed in your behavior." When I was young, I would have slunk away and said nothing if I’d
received a dressing down like that for something I was guilty of. But
you know what? Four kids actually sought me out—even though I’d said I
wasn’t going to try to find out who was guilty—and apologized. No
excuses. No trying to water down their guilt. They admitted their
mistake and apologized. With kids like that around, I think the future looks pretty bright. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor In many Christian denominations, communion is a closed event. Only adherents to that faith are allowed to figuratively and ceremonially eat the body and drink the blood of Christ. By contrast, Seventh-day Adventists practice an open communion. We invite any who've accepted Jesus as Savior to participate in this celebration of redemption. The fact that someone may not have been baptized by immersion isn't considered an obstacle. The fact that a person doesn't subscribe to Seventh-day Adventist understandings of scripture, isn't a barrier. In fact, each person determines for himself or herself whether or not to participate. Except for the children, that is. Typically, the children are excluded. Granted, when Jesus celebrated the first communion with His disciples, no children participated. And in most denominations, including most Seventh-day Adventist congregations, children still don't participate--at least, not until after they've been baptized by immersion (or confirmed). Of course, if we make too much of the fact that children didn't participate with Jesus and His disciples, we'd need to exclude women as well. That first communion was definitely an all-male, all-adult event. But somehow I get the idea that God would want both women and children to join in this celebration of deliverance from sin that His Son Jesus has made possible. Let's note some history. The first communion was merely an addendum to the Passover supper. The Passover was a celebration of physical deliverance from slavery in Egypt--a deliverance made possible by God's mighty acts of intervention. In fact, one important purpose of the Passover was to promote discussion between parents and children about the wonderful things God had done for His people in rescuing them. In Exodus 12:25-27, we read God's instructions to Moses: "'When you enter the land that the Lord will give you as he promised, observe this ceremony [the Passover]. And when your children ask you, "What does this ceremony mean to you?" then tell them, "It is the Passover sacrifice to the Lord, who passed over the houses of the Israelites in Egypt and spared our homes when he struck down the Egyptians."'" Since the Passover was part of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which lasted seven days, we can be quite sure children participated. (It's not likely that they fasted the entire seven days or that they ate leavened bread while their parents didn't.) Further, the Passover instructions given by Moses to the Hebrews included: "Go at once and select the animals for your families and slaughter the Passover lamb" (Exodus 12:21, emphasis mine). Further, Moses states that "each man is to take a lamb for his family, one for each household" (Exodus 12:3, emphasis mine). And he even suggests that "if any household is too small for a whole lamb, they must share one with their nearest neighbor, having taken into account the number of people there are" (Exodus 12:4). It definitely sounds like a "kids welcome/everyone welcome" activity--not just Mom, Dad and any other adult family members who happen to be present. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor Last week we talked about the Seventh-day Adventist practice of an open communion, in which we allow all who've accepted Jesus as Savior to take part, irrespective of denominational affiliation or theological perspective. Unless they're children, that is. That's where we draw the line. But wait. Did you know that in the NIV, the word "children" is used 404 times? "Child" 109 times? "Boy" 79 times? "Girl" 59 times? The Bible seems to have been particularly interested in children. The Passover (the forerunner to communion, which we discussed last week) wasn't the only memorial given in great measure for the benefit of children. By no means. Interestingly, when the Hebrews miraculously walked through the flooded Jordan River on dry land, Joshua commanded that a representative of each of the 12 tribes take a huge river rock from the riverbed to set up a memorial to commemorate this grand event. "'In the future,' Joshua told the people, 'when your children ask you, "what do these stones mean?" tell them that the flow of the Jordan was cut off before the ark of the covenant of the Lord. When it crossed the Jordan, the waters of the Jordan were cut off'" (Joshua 3: 6, 7). All too often children are given short shrift in a broad range of spiritual activities. But Jesus didn't seem to go along with that practice. In fact, Jesus seemed to have particular care and concern for the often-ignored members of society. As a result, it wasn't uncommon for Him to associate with women, with the poor, with the socially disadvantaged, with people considered to be great sinners . . . and with children. When mothers brought their children to Jesus to be blessed by Him, His disciples thought it all a colossal waste of time. So "the disciples rebuked them. When Jesus saw this, he was indignant. He said to them, 'Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. I tell you the truth, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.' And he took the children in his arms, put his hands on them and blessed them" (Mark 10:13-16). Excluding children didn't sit with Jesus. It ticked Him off. Or, as the preceding text says, it made Him "indignant." He definitely had strong feelings about it. So, let me ask: In the light of how the Passover (the forerunner of communion) was practiced in the Old Testament, in light of the Bible's care to establish natural springboards for discussion so children will ask questions of their parents about spiritual things, in light of the importance Jesus seems to place on children, would Jesus find it somehow offensive for children to participate in a ritual that provides wonderful opportunities for parents to talk to their children about the ultimate spiritual truth--salvation? I doubt it. But I still haven't answered a crucial question: Aren't children too young to understand the meaning of communion? Since we're out of space, you'll have to wait yet another week for an answer to that question. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor |
||
|
|
|