|
|||
|
|
|
|
Fine Prints: March, 2008 The God Squad--1 March 1 The God Squad--2 March 8 Etiquette, Ethics and Costco March 15 Freedom and the Resurrection March 22 Of Such Things Wars are Made March 29
The God Squad--1
Youthful
idealism is a pain in the neck—if you’re a middle-aged adult, that is.
Youth have a disconcerting way of cutting through sham, pretense and
self-justification. They get right to the core. Their
hypocrisy/inconsistency meters are finely tuned. Let me tell you a story. When I was a student at Newbold College in the early
1970s, a wave of youthful idealism was sweeping the campus, much to the
consternation of the faculty. You see, adults desperately want kids to
be religious—but not too religious. Too religious is highly
inconvenient. Ambrose Bierce obviously had insights into this
phenomenon when in his Devil’s Dictionary he defined "Christian"
as: "One who follows the teachings of Christ in so far as they are not
inconsistent with a life of sin." In the Seventh-day Adventist Church, the writings of Ellen G. White
are held up as the standard to follow—at least, those parts of her
advice that don’t get in the way of what we really want to do. But youth approach life with more of a blank slate. Not
to mention a clearer picture of what constitutes consistency. Anyway, at Newbold, students were given reams of
research assignments from the writings of Ellen White. And when you
research one topic, you invariably pick up a few thoughts on other
topics as well. Granted that our statement of Fundamental Beliefs says
that Ellen White’s writings are a manifestation of the gift of prophecy
and an identifying mark of the Remnant Church, it seemed a good idea to
pay close attention to what she said. And she said eating between meals
was taboo. Not to mention that she was negative toward sugar-laden
foods. For a youthful idealist like I was back then, it seemed
pretty straight-forward. At student social functions, we often had
refreshments. These not only were served between meals, but they were
sugar-laden. This obviously had to stop. Addresssing the Newbold Student Association (NSA), I
outlined my concerns. Clearly, I said, we were out of sync with our
prophet’s advice. I moved that no longer should any between-meals,
sugar-laden refreshments be served at NSA functions. Another student
seconded my motion. The student body voted. And idealism won the day.
Sugar-laden, between-meals refreshments would no longer be served. Then I made a second motion—and this is how youthful
idealism really gets under the skin of the older establishment: I moved
that we encourage the faculty to follow our good example in all those
social events for which they were responsible. Despite the fact that our recommendation was
research-based, and despite the fact that we were upholding the words of
the prophet, the faculty were less than enthusiastic. They’d already
decided that those particular words of advice didn’t apply. Whereas we
youth were assuming that all the prophet’s words applied. Solomon advises us not to be overly righteous. In the
eyes of the faculty, we were guilty of just that. So in their
administrative meetings, the faculty dubbed a few of us "The God Squad"
and discussed ways to get us to be more balanced. Like I said, youthful idealism is a real pain in the
neck. We’ll talk more about it next week. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor
The God Squad--2
Last week I told how I was able to persuade the Newbold Student
Association (the entire student body of Newbold College) to vote not to
serve sugar-laden, between-meals refreshments at student-association
functions. It still amazes me that they passed such radical legislation. I based my arguments on the fact that Adventism’s
prophetic voice, Ellen G. White, decries both between-meals eating and
sugar-laden foods. So it seemed the thing to do. The faculty saw it as
being overly religious, however. They weren’t favorably
impressed––especially when we passed a motion urging them to follow our
example in all the social functions for which they were
responsible. They dubbed my fellow zealots and me "The God Squad." Of course, success begets success. Having won such an
astounding victory, my fellow revolutionaries and I looked for new
worlds to conquer. And we quickly found one right in our own dorm––in
the form of the "tuck shop." (I think the word "tuck" is a shortened
form of "tucker," which means food.) The shop sold potato chips, soft
drink, candy bars and other evil edibles to raise money for the men’s
club––The Brotherhood. Summoning my best skills of argumentation, I convinced
my fellow residents of Keough House that all the unhealthful items sold
in the "muck shop" had to go. And again they voted in my favor. (Clearly
I’ve lost my persuasive touch in the intervening years!) The preceptor
(dean)––and the rest of the faculty, when they heard about it––were less
than happy. As am I, whenever I think back on it. You see, mere legislation accomplishes little––a fact
that the religious right would be well advised to note. If the heart and
mind aren’t convicted, forced conformity achieves little, if any,
long-term benefit. I discovered that before this story ended. An hour or two after I graduated, I was in my room
packing up three years’ worth of accumulated junk when I heard the
dorm’s public-address kick on. For a moment I thought it was
malfunctioning because there was a crunching, crackling sound. Then I
realized it was the sound of someone chewing directly into the
microphone. "Do you recognize the sound you’ve just heard?" It was
the preceptor’s voice. "That was the sound of me, eating potato chips!
And do you recognize this sound?" he asked, loudly chugging down some
liquid. "That’s me, drinking a once-forbidden soft drink! And
this is the sound of a candy-bar wrapper being opened! "Come down and buy all the potato chips, soft drink and
candy bars you want, because they’re now available once again at the
tuck shop. Because ‘guess who?’ is no longer here!" It had taken less than two hours for things to return to
normal once the heavy hand of The God Squad was no longer present. Oh,
we’d been able to force conformity. We’d even been able to do it through
a democratic process. But we really hadn’t changed the hearts and minds.
So what’s changed, if anything? I still argue for what I
believe in. I still urge people to follow a particular course of action
that reveals high values. But I don’t intend to impose my will on
anyone. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor [The Bible says a merry heart is like a medicine. The following Fine Print is for "medicinal" purposes only. It has no other morally redeeming qualities!] We all like the free food samples at Costco. But what’s the proper etiquette (and ethics) when taking these handouts. The following may prove helpful. Q. Is it OK to go back for seconds, thirds and fourths? A. If you seriously might buy, go back as often as you like. But be sure to tell the attendant that you’re not just pigging out; you’re doing a "feasibility study." Q. What if I want a few more samples of a product I know I’m not going to buy? A. You have three options: (1) Control yourself. (2) Risk sullying your image. Or (3) when taking the last of your many samples, tell the attendant (in a conspiratorial whisper) that your identical twin sister who’s out shopping with you just confided that she’s been coming back for sample after sample after sample. You just had to see what could taste so good that she’d be willing to embarrass herself by looking like such a glutton. (Of course, if you’re a man, say it was your identical twin brother!) Q. Should I make eye contact with the attendant and ask questions, just to make it look like I might buy? A. The less attention you draw to yourself the better. The ideal is to follow an extra-tall person from station to station, reaching around in such a way that your face is always hidden. Be sure to remove all rings, because an alert attendant might recognize rings if they appear repeatedly—particularly if he/she works after-hours as a jewel thief. And if you have any fingers missing on one hand, be sure to use the other hand. Q. I usually carry several wigs and pairs of old glasses in my purse so I can change my appearance. Is that OK? A. No. That’s dishonest. Q. Was my girlfriend unreasonable in getting angry when I took her to Costco to taste the free samples—after having promised to take her out to eat "at a really cool buffet"? A. No. She wasn’t unreasonable. Women don’t appreciate gifts they know you got for free. To make any impact, you have to spend money. Now, if while at Costco you’d bought your sweetie a new drill or a set of wrenches, there probably wouldn’t have been a problem. Women like men who tune in to their feelings. A word of warning: Unlike men, women possess a unique neurophysiology that makes them capable of multi-tasking. Which means that while you focus on one thing at a time—like, first, how to save money; and, then, how to convince her that it was meant to be a joke—a woman is capable of simultaneously plotting an almost infinite number of totally different avenues for revenge. Q. Are there other stores like Costco that regularly give out free samples of food? I mean, I don’t like always going out to eat at the same place. A. Sorry. Costco has all but cornered the free-food
market––short of dumpster-diving, that is. Jim Coffin, Senior Pastor In Luke 8:1-3* we read: "After this, Jesus traveled
about from one town and village to another, proclaiming the good news of
the kingdom of God. The Twelve were with him, and also some women who
had been cured of evil spirits and diseases: Mary (called Magdalene)
from whom seven demons had come out; Joanna the wife of Cuza, the
manager of Herod's household; Susanna; and many others. These women were
helping to support them out of their own means."
Of Such Things Wars are Made
Last summer, our Markham Woods Vacation Bible School was made a lot more
interesting and a lot more educational because Rabbi Rick Sherwin of
Congregation Beth Am agreed to come and lead out in a daily "synagogue"
segment. Thanks to Rabbi Rick, the children learned about
Judaism’s spiritual holidays. They learned a few words of Hebrew. They
learned to sing a song or two in Hebrew. They developed a whole new
appreciation for what life would have been like in the time of
Jesus––even though one might not expect to learn such lessons from a
rabbi! Rabbi Rick took the place by storm. He was such a hit
with both the children and the adult helpers that I was beginning to
fear for my job! I was afraid that if the week didn’t come to an end
soon, a lot of Markham Woods members might start attending worship
services at Beth Am instead of here! (Obviously, I’m speaking somewhat
tongue-in-cheek. But he really was a tremendous asset to our VBS.) By the time the week was drawing to a close, Rick was
such a natural part of the overall VBS scene that––functioning on
autopilot, as I too often do––I absentmindedly told one of the helpers
to go find "Pastor Rick." No sooner were the words out of my mouth than
I realized my mistake. But at that very moment, Rabbi Rick came around
the corner––and I was sure he’d heard what I said. What would he think? Would he think I was trying to make
him the butt of some joke? Would he think I was cutting him down behind
his back? Would he view my faux pas as a put-down of Judaism?
Would he accept the explanation that I was forming in my mind? You see, of such misunderstandings wars are made. It
might be just one person beginning to hate another because of a
perceived slight. Or it might be one family against another, as happened
with the Hatfields and McCoys. Or it might be one nation taking up arms
against another, simply because of some
unintended-but-not-adequately-resolved affront. So how was Rabbi Rick
going to respond to having been called "Pastor Rick"? Without even breaking stride as he rounded the corner,
Rick said to the VBS helper I’d sent to find him, "You tell Rabbi Jim
that I’m already here!" It’s great when the person you potentially have offended
has such a broad outlook and is so self-assured and self-effacing that
he doesn’t look for sinister motives in an undeniable faux pas.
Obviously, Rick’s a pretty broad-minded rabbi or he wouldn’t have been
helping a Christian congregation with its Vacation Bible School! But there’s another factor at play as well. If there’s a
longstanding relationship, and a considerable amount of goodwill has
been built up, the party guilty of foot-in-mouth may be given a pass.
The potential "offendee" will probably view the mistake through far more
sympathetic lenses than if no such relationship exists. Didn’t Jesus say that a person who has friends must show
himself friendly? I think He was talking about building up goodwill.
Because otherwise, mistakes can lead to war.
|
||
|
|
|